Yehia Elrakaiby presented his joint work with Alessio Ferrari at the 25th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference. The topic was about the use of argumentation to explain ambiguities in oral interviews. The goal of the presentation was to show that argumentation theory can be used to detect and formally explain unclear requirements or misunderstandings between a requirements analyst and a customer. This is a data-grounded contribution that provides a theoretical basis to have a more complete understanding of the ambiguity phenomenon, and lays the foundations to design intelligent computer-based agents that are able to automatically identify ambiguities.
Similar Posts
Sorren Presents at SERF 2017
Sorren presented a paper on the ‘Use of Organisational Topologies for Forensic Investigations’ at the 1st International Workshop on Software Engineering and Digital Forensics (SERF) co-located with ESEC/FSE 2017. The…
Bashar gives opening keynote address at RE’19 in South Korea
Bashar Nuseibeh delivered the opening keynote at RE’19, the 27th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, which was held in Jeju Island, South Korea, between 23-27 September 2019. Bashar’s talk, entitled…
Fanny Presents at REFSQ 2022
Fanny Rivera-Ortiz has presented a research paper entitled, “Engineering Forensic-Ready Software Systems Using Automated Logging“, at the Doctoral Symposium collocated with REFSQ 2022, in Birmingham, UK. In her presentation, Fanny introduces a…
Liliana’s Paper Selected as Best Runner-Up in IEEE Software
Dr. Liliana Pasquale and her esteemed colleagues’ research paper, titled “Digital Age of Consent and Age Verification: Can They Protect Children?“, has been selected as the Best Runner-Up Paper in…
SPARE Members Present at the NII GRACE Centre Symposium and Workshop
Bashar, Jesus, and Liliana attended the NII GRACE Centre Symposium and Worksop, held in Tokyo on 19-20 December 2017. The workshop on the 19th December focused on software engineering of…
