Yehia Elrakaiby presented his joint work with Alessio Ferrari at the 25th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference. The topic was about the use of argumentation to explain ambiguities in oral interviews. The goal of the presentation was to show that argumentation theory can be used to detect and formally explain unclear requirements or misunderstandings between a requirements analyst and a customer. This is a data-grounded contribution that provides a theoretical basis to have a more complete understanding of the ambiguity phenomenon, and lays the foundations to design intelligent computer-based agents that are able to automatically identify ambiguities.
Similar Posts
“Article of the Week”
Our paper entitled “LiveBox: A Self-Adaptive Forensic-Ready Service for Drones” was featured as the IEEE Access “Article of the Week”. The work is a collaboration with our colleagues at the…
Liliana’s Paper Selected as Best Runner-Up in IEEE Software
Dr. Liliana Pasquale and her esteemed colleagues’ research paper, titled “Digital Age of Consent and Age Verification: Can They Protect Children?“, has been selected as the Best Runner-Up Paper in…
Bashar gives opening keynote address at RE’19 in South Korea
Bashar Nuseibeh delivered the opening keynote at RE’19, the 27th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, which was held in Jeju Island, South Korea, between 23-27 September 2019. Bashar’s talk, entitled…
SPARE Members Present at the NII GRACE Centre Symposium and Workshop
Bashar, Jesus, and Liliana attended the NII GRACE Centre Symposium and Worksop, held in Tokyo on 19-20 December 2017. The workshop on the 19th December focused on software engineering of…
