Yehia Elrakaiby presented his joint work with Alessio Ferrari at the 25th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference. The topic was about the use of argumentation to explain ambiguities in oral interviews. The goal of the presentation was to show that argumentation theory can be used to detect and formally explain unclear requirements or misunderstandings between a requirements analyst and a customer. This is a data-grounded contribution that provides a theoretical basis to have a more complete understanding of the ambiguity phenomenon, and lays the foundations to design intelligent computer-based agents that are able to automatically identify ambiguities.
Similar Posts
Test of time award for Liliana
Liliana Pasquale will receive the Most Influential Paper Award at the 28th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE’20) in Switzerland, in recognition of her paper entitled: “Fuzzy Goals for Requirements-Driven Adaptation”,…
Bashar gives Keynote Address at ESEC/FSE in Italy
The keynote was titled, “Software without Boundaries: engineering secure invisible software”.
- EPE - Forensics - Interviews - Papers
WannaCry Highlights the Need for Engineering Forensic Ready Systems!
Are current systems ready to identify the cause of cyber attacks and apprehend the perpetrators? In his study, ‘Are You Ready? Towards the Engineering of Forensic-Ready Systems‘, George found that…
Bashar gives opening keynote address at RE’19 in South Korea
Bashar Nuseibeh delivered the opening keynote at RE’19, the 27th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, which was held in Jeju Island, South Korea, between 23-27 September 2019. Bashar’s talk, entitled…
Liliana’s Paper Selected as Best Runner-Up in IEEE Software
Dr. Liliana Pasquale and her esteemed colleagues’ research paper, titled “Digital Age of Consent and Age Verification: Can They Protect Children?“, has been selected as the Best Runner-Up Paper in…
